Comments on: Update on USAA’s Short Sale Policy http://www.quincycove.com/2010/01/16/update-on-usaas-short-sale-policy/ Premier Online News For The Greater Boston Area Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:17:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: swizzle http://www.quincycove.com/2010/01/16/update-on-usaas-short-sale-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-9 swizzle Tue, 02 Feb 2010 10:02:12 +0000 http://www.quincycove.com/?p=636#comment-9 "Jane Philo", I seriously doubt you are an employee. In fact, based on your writing style and word choice, I think you are Robert J Koenig. You've got a long history of internet postings of legal inaccuracies and multiple legal opinions that don't support your argument. None of your comment really applies to the article on this page, which, in fact, is not new news. I've seen the same image of a letter from USAA and virtually identical article somewhere else.....troubling if true, but not news. “Jane Philo”,

I seriously doubt you are an employee. In fact, based on your writing style and word choice, I think you are Robert J Koenig. You’ve got a long history of internet postings of legal inaccuracies and multiple legal opinions that don’t support your argument. None of your comment really applies to the article on this page, which, in fact, is not new news. I’ve seen the same image of a letter from USAA and virtually identical article somewhere else…..troubling if true, but not news.

]]> By: Jane Philo http://www.quincycove.com/2010/01/16/update-on-usaas-short-sale-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-4 Jane Philo Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:00:57 +0000 http://www.quincycove.com/?p=636#comment-4 USAA is a vicious and corrupt negotiator in all dealings: corrupt with its subscribers (the true members, who subscribe to the reciprocal interinsurance exchange); dishonest with its other customers (who are not even true members); and especially vicious with its employees. I am an employee (an attorney). And there persists the question as to how the RICO 18 USC § 1962(c) "association in fact" at USAA got its clammy paws on the $14,000,000,000 the operators have pried away from the subscribers to the exchange. A good place for honest lawyers to start is with two federal statutes: 18 U.S.C. § 1346 : US Code - Section 1346: Definition of "scheme or artifice to defraud" and 18 U.S.C. § 1001 False Statements The direct path for relief will ultimately be in Federal Court - but it is important to remember that Judge Orlando Garcia (Federal District Court - San Antonio) and Judge Fortunato P. Benavides (5th Circuit Appeals - New Orleans) are very very favorably inclined towards the people who run USAA: something of a mutual admiration society. The body responsible to the members at USAA is the Board of Directors: the 15 or so members who pay themselves $300,000 each to oversee the insurance exchange and the unlawful financial services holding company illegally bolted to the exchange. The correct legal theory to pry the directors away from the immunity granted them by Judges Garcia and Benavides is respondeat superior. USAA is a vicious and corrupt negotiator in all dealings: corrupt with its subscribers (the true members, who subscribe to the reciprocal interinsurance exchange); dishonest with its other customers (who are not even true members); and especially vicious with its employees. I am an employee (an attorney). And there persists the question as to how the RICO 18 USC § 1962(c) “association in fact” at USAA got its clammy paws on the $14,000,000,000 the operators have pried away from the subscribers to the exchange. A good place for honest lawyers to start is with two federal statutes:

18 U.S.C. § 1346 : US Code – Section 1346: Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”

and

18 U.S.C. § 1001 False Statements

The direct path for relief will ultimately be in Federal Court – but it is important to remember that Judge Orlando Garcia (Federal District Court – San Antonio) and Judge Fortunato P. Benavides (5th Circuit Appeals – New Orleans) are very very favorably inclined towards the people who run USAA: something of a mutual admiration society. The body responsible to the members at USAA is the Board of Directors: the 15 or so members who pay themselves $300,000 each to oversee the insurance exchange and the unlawful financial services holding company illegally bolted to the exchange. The correct legal theory to pry the directors away from the immunity granted them by Judges Garcia and Benavides is respondeat superior.

]]>